"we're never going to hear how our poetry sounds"
I thought I would post an email today
that was in response to one of my earlier blogs
I really thought it was well written
and deserved a posting.
let me know your thoughts
"...would be curious to know more of what caused your reaction.
the 'is poetry dead' sentence is an intriguing one.
my answer would be no, not at all. neither is painting,
or illuminated manuscripts for that matter. we are.
we are the dead things.
its not that these mediums don't have the capability
to express our super advanced 21st century emotions.
its just that emoticons and yahoo messenger do it better.
what you see generally isn't poetry.
its a plastic imitation of a form that meant something in a
culture that doesn't exist anymore.
its like the kids that dress up in indian costumes and
have tribal dance costumes through the boy scouts.
the forms are right, technically, but, to quote inigo montoya
"you keep using that word...i do not think it means what you think it means."
those people who do get through and write in the medium
(and i'm tossing myself in the pile while my failures outnumber my successes 10 to 1)
be it poetry or painting, are still simply referencing another culture,
another time. we are not holdovers. we are not a continuation.
we are a parallax. stuck, despite ourselves, like bad time travellers.
its still in us, though not all, this stuck notion of a sensibility.
its like our great grandfathers asthetic got stuck in a couple generations of spermazoa
and popped out in us, at the wrong time. so i guess, as usual. i don't know.
poetry though, isn't dead.
but what they're doing, that imitation of another culture's form of it. maybe so.
maybe so. perhaps there is a lazarus among us. perhaps we're only sleeping.
but someone's got to stop the noise being made by the dopplegangers,
or we're never going to hear how our poetry sounds. "
-matt tetzloff 4/26/05